|
VOTE FOR STEVE COOLEY ON NOVEMBER 2, 2010 |
Although self-defense civil rights advocacy groups have not taken an official position on Steve Cooley as a candidate for Attorney General of the State of California, the choice is obvious. In my personal experience defending hundreds of citizens accused of violating California’s hyper-technical gun laws, as District Attorney for the County of Los Angeles Steve Cooley has been reasonable and fair in administering the criminal firearm cases that I have litigated through the Los Angeles County court system. And he has refused to be recruited into the ranks of politicians passing feel-good-do-nothing gun control laws. Through his policies, Steve Cooley has reflected an understanding of the complexity of California gun control laws, an understanding for how easy it is to inadvertently violate one of these laws, a resistance to politicizing the prosecutorial process and sympathy for good people caught up by ill-conceived laws that do nothing to fight violent crime.
But even if he was much worse on these issues, the choice would still be obvious. As the points made below should clearly demonstrate, if elected as Attorney General, Kamala Harris would be a Second Amendment civil right advocate’s nightmare. She has absolutely no respect for the right to choose to own a firearm to defend yourself or your family, and no sympathy for those good people inadvertently snared by bad gun control laws.
|
|
Read 243 times
|
|
Written by C D Michel
|
| |
|
Current Articles
|
VICTORY IN MILLENDER v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES |
On August 24, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in the case of Millender v. County of Los Angeles, et al. (07-55518), affirmed that a search warrant requesting the seizure of "all handguns, rifles or shotguns of any caliber, or any firearms capable of firing ammunition..." was unlawful, when the deputies who sought the warrant were aware that they were searching for one specific firearm. This opinion confirmed the position advocated by the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA) Foundation in their amicus (friend of the court) brief filed in support of the Millenders on October 22, 2009. A copy of the brief, along with the opinion, other case related brief, and memorandum analyzing the opinion are posted below.
|
|
Read 2845 times
|
|
Written by C D Michel
|
| |
|
NRA/CRPA FOUNDATION LEGAL ACTION PROJECT LAWYERS SUBMIT PRE-LITIGATION PETITION FOR REVIEW OF FISH & GAME HUNTING REGULATIONS THAT INFRINGE ON SELF-DEFENSE RIGHTS |
On August 23, 2010 the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA) Foundation, through their joint California "Legal Action Project," sent a petition letter to the California Fish and Game Commission challenging certain hunting regulations. These regulations were adopted by the Commission to regulate the mere possession of firearms and/or lead ammunition when engaged in certain activities and/or when present in certain areas, such as designated wildlife areas.
|
|
Read 526 times
|
|
Written by C D Michel
|
| |
|
MULTIPLE LEGAL BRIEFS FILED IN NORDYKE v. ALAMEDA; NINTH CIRCUIT CASE MAY DETERMINE THE STANDARD OF REVIEW FOR SCRUTINIZING LAWS FACING SECOND AMENDMENT CHALLENGES |
August 18, 2010
Today multiple briefs have been filed in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals supporting gun show owners who have challenged an Alameda County ordinance banning firearms on county property, including the county fairgrounds. These include amicus briefs by the National Rifle Association, CATO Institute, Second Amendment Foundation, and Calguns Foundation, as well as the brief for the plaintiffs, the Nordykes. Yesterday the California Rifle and Pistol Association Foundation (CRPAF) filed its amicus brief.
|
|
Read 401 times
|
|
Written by C D Michel
|
| |
|
CRPA FOUNDATION FILES AMICUS BRIEF IN NINTH CIRCUIT CASE THAT MAY DETERMINE THE STANDARD OF REVIEW FOR SCRUTINIZING LAWS FACING SECOND AMENDMENT CHALLENGES |
Today the California Rifle and Pistol Association Foundation (CRPAF) filed an amicus brief in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals supporting gun show owners who have challenged an Alameda County ordinance banning firearms on county property, including the county fairgrounds. Click here to view a copy of the brief.
The Alameda ordinance effectively prohibits gun shows from taking place on the Alameda County Fairgrounds. The Nordyke family promoted gun shows at the Alameda County Fairgrounds in Pleasanton from 1991 to 1999. Although no violence was associated with the gun show, Alameda County nonetheless passed the ordinance in 1999 as a way to stop pro-Second Amendment and civil rights activists from gathering there. The Nordykes sued, challenging the ordinance on multiple grounds.
|
|
Read 400 times
|
|
Written by C D Michel
|
| |
|
Recent Headlines
|
|
Older Articles...
|      Title |   | Reads |
|   | 770 |
|   | 1082 |
|   | 1038 |
|   | 969 |
|   | 375 |
|   | 528 |
|   | 586 |
|   | 1410 |
|   | 413 |
|   | 1257 |
|
|
|
Latest Additions Top Ten Most Read
|